To print this page properly - use Print icon located on the page.
Please note that JavaScript has to be enabled.
background JPEG 2.jpg
  

Top of Form

Outplacement Firms Struggle to Do Job

By PHRED DVORAK and JOANN S. LUBLIN

The Wall Street Journal

When PepsiCo Inc. laid off administrative assistant Sonia Service in February 2008, she thought she'd have a leg up on her next job. Pepsi referred Ms. Service to an "outplacement" firm that specializes in helping laid-off employees get new work.

View Full Image

Dennis Kale for The Wall Street Journal

Damian Birkel, a former outplacement counselor, teaches at Professionals in Transition, a nonprofit self-help group he founded for the unemployed.

Eighteen months later, Ms. Service says outplacement was a waste of time. She says the job-search training was rushed. During a practice lunch interview, a coach chided her for ordering cranberry juice, saying it could be interpreted as a sign of a urinary-tract infection, she recalls. Her résumé was sent to a prospective employer with a cover letter that included a typo and bore her signature -- which she says she never saw.

"I am embarrassed," says Ms. Service. She still hasn't landed a job.

As demand rises in the $4 billion-a-year outplacement business, providers increasingly offer standardized services, which some workers say offer little value. Businesses anxious to shed former employees quickly and cheaply impose time limits that hamper effectiveness. Few employers track whether outplacement works.

Skeptical employees are voting with their feet: Executives estimate about 40% of workers offered outplacement services don't show up; some ask for cash instead.

Look-Alike Letters

View Interactive

Compare cover letters for two job-seekers.

Some industry participants, too, are troubled by reports of mass-produced résumés, canned job advice and slipshod counseling. "It breaks my heart when I hear about stuff like that happening," says Celeste Calfe, North American board president of the Association of Career Firms, a trade group. "And I know it's happening."

Outplacement firms say some frustration with their services reflects the stress of trying to find work during the downturn. "We understand that clients get angry; angry at their former employer, angry at us, angry at the prospective employers that don't seem to be calling back," John Challenger, CEO of Chicago-based outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc., wrote in response to questions.

Outplacement services arose in the 1960s to provide out-of-work managers with the trappings of a job, such as an office, a phone and a secretary. Layoffs were less common and participants needed to battle the stigma of losing a job.

By the 1990s, outplacement firms expanded to serve everyone from CEOs to hourly workers. Providers competed by lowering prices, offering volume discounts to corporate clients for an increasingly standardized menu of workshops and referral services.

Now, outplacement is a standard feature of corporate layoffs. More than two-thirds of 265 U.S. employers with layoffs during the past two years offered outplacement, at an average cost of $3,589 an employee, according to a June survey for The Wall Street Journal by the American Management Association and Institute for Corporate Productivity.

Recipients typically get access to an office and a coach, either in one-on-one or group sessions. They also usually get help with résumé writing, interviewing and job leads.

Business is booming amid the recession. Right Management, the Manpower Inc. unit that's the nation's largest outplacement firm, posted a 36% increase in second-quarter revenue, to $158 million. Right expects to serve 200,000 people world-wide this year, twice as many as last year; it says revenue is rising more slowly because companies are opting for cheaper group services. Second-quarter revenue at Lee Hecht Harrison, another big provider that is a unit of Switzerland's Adecco SA, jumped 57% to $119 million.

Journal Community

Outplacement firms say their services are effective. Right Management says 95% of the people who used its services in 2008 were satisfied. The company says clients who report back to them about getting jobs do so in an average of 16 weeks. Challenger, Gray & Christmas, which says it pioneered outplacement, says its clients find jobs in a median of 14 weeks.

Yet both companies say they don't track the percentage of total clients who find work before their outplacement programs end. Challenger says it's now writing software to do so; Right Management says it's hard to get accurate data since some clients leave midprogram and others don't notify the firm when they land jobs.

Employers say they offer outplacement to protect their reputations, forestall lawsuits and minimize unemployment-insurance payments.

It's "a good thing to do from a PR perspective," says Manny Avramidis, the American Management Association's senior vice president for global human resources. Mr. Avramidis says he isn't sure if outplacement is effective, but he offered the service to 60 workers the AMA laid off in October.

Outplacement typically begins the day an employee is laid off. Providers often send staff members to each work site to explain their services. The process helps companies efficiently show employees the door, and gives the outplacement firms -- which are often paid only for the workers who use them -- a chance to market themselves.

Employees usually gain access to online seminars, group workshops and individual time with a coach, for periods ranging from a month to more than a year. Programs for executives, priced around $10,000 and up, generally provide a private office and more coaching time; those for midlevel managers or clerical workers, priced $5,000 or below, may offer a chair and phone at a shared table. Workers can also tap job-search boards.

Some activities appear to follow routines. Two Challenger clients, executives from different companies and different parts of the country, describe mock job interviews over lunch with their coaches.

One man says he was scolded for not following his coach to the restroom to continue the conversation. The other says he was chided for ordering diet soda because it suggested immaturity. Both executives asked not to be identified.

Cigdem Oktem, a management consultant, was laid off by Corporate Executive Board, a Washington, D.C., consulting firm, in February, along with a few hundred colleagues. Ms. Oktem says she got six months of outplacement counseling at Lee Hecht Harrison's Washington offices. When a family emergency demanded her attention for a few months, Lee Hecht let her pause and restart the service.

Lee Hecht provided a clear, 10-step process for finding a job, including a spreadsheet for tracking calls, leads and interviews, Ms. Oktem says. The firm organized weekly meetings where she could trade tips and contacts. And it gave her unlimited one-on-one access to a coach, with whom she still meets every two weeks for advice and moral support. She hasn't found a job yet, but has interviews lined up. Overall, she says, outplacement has been a boon.

One challenge for the industry is that laid-off workers have different needs. Some like going to an office; others are happy to connect online. Many like career counseling but don't want help with their résumés.

By contrast, John Farmer, a 61-year-old executive in Dallas who was laid off from a financial company in February, hadn't written a résumé in 20 years and wanted help. But he found coaching sessions to be "almost like grief counseling," he says.

"One size doesn't fit all," says Harry J. Martin, a management professor at Cleveland State University and one of the few academics to study outplacement. Mr. Martin was co-author of a paper last year decrying "commodity outplacement" and urging more individual attention.

Some employers are experimenting with cheaper approaches. Lora Villarreal, chief personnel officer at Affiliated Computer Services Inc., last year hired RiseSmart Inc., an online provider, to offer outplacement to 4,200 workers. RiseSmart culls job boards and social-networking sites, then sends weekly alerts to users. It also provides individual phone counseling and online group seminars.

Ms. Villareal was unhappy with ACS's prior, more expensive outplacement firm; she says former staffers complained they didn't get individual attention. RiseSmart CEO Sanjay Sathe says a standard six-month package costs an employer about $2,500 a person.

Chet Shubert, 53, arranged outplacement as a human-resource executive at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and National Starch & Chemical Co. Last year, it was his turn, when he was laid off following a merger. He says he was offered several months of outplacement at Right's Management's Philadelphia office. In his first group meeting, he was surprised when a staff member said the firm didn't track how many clients get jobs.

Mr. Shubert says he got access to job-posting sites and group workshops on topics like preparing a résumé or closing a deal; equivalent material can be found online, he says. He says his coach didn't offer useful advice.

Mr. Shubert's verdict: "truly boilerplate" and "lacking for middle and upper management." He says he stopped going after about a month; he later found a job on his own, from which he was recently laid off.

Right President Doug Matthews, in a written response, says each participant works with a coach to develop a job-search plan tailored to his or her "unique learning style, needs, skill level, and desired outcome."

Damian Birkel, a career coach, joined Right in June 2007, initially as a contract counselor and later as a full-time employee. He primarily worked from home, but spent at least one day a week in Right's office in High Point, N.C.

Mr. Birkel says Right assigned him 60 people, a minimum of 15 a day, to coach by phone or online. One month of outplacement included no more than four hours of counseling, he says, a limited number of online seminars and access to a portion of Right's Web site. Most users received one to three months of services, which often ended before they found work, he says.

Mr. Birkel says Right fired him in August 2008, after he extended counseling time for people whose outplacement had expired. One was a single mother who'd missed appointments while trying to retain her foreclosed home. "I wasn't cut out for over-the-phone, fast-food outplacement," says Mr. Birkel.

Right's Mr. Matthews confirmed Mr. Birkel's employment dates but declined to comment further, citing privacy laws. He says Right is committed to "individualized counseling."

Ms. Service, the former administrative assistant at Pepsi, was offered outplacement with Challenger, Pepsi's main provider for about the past decade. She was invited to a two-day individual workshop in a suburban New York hotel near her former office, where a coach reviewed skills such as crafting résumés and cover letters.

The coach said Challenger would check online regularly for relevant vacancies, then send Ms. Service's résumé and cover letter to prospective employers.

Ms. Service didn't like Challenger's rewrite of her résumé because it contained too many dates she thought would reveal her age; she says she asked Challenger not to use it. Ms. Service says she never saw the finished cover letter. Ms. Service was later surprised to find that the résumé and a cover letter -- which contained a double comma and the date written as "February 05" -- had been sent to a New York public-relations firm on her behalf earlier this year.

Documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal showed the materials resemble those of another ex-Pepsi job seeker sent to the same firm -- including the same typo and quirky date style. The firm's president says he eliminated both women from consideration as his executive assistant. "We didn't take the letters seriously because they did not reflect an understanding of our company -- and they looked alike,'' he says. (Click here to see the letters.)

Ms. Service says she learned about the mailed letter and résumé from the Journal. Pepsi spokesman David DeCecco says the issues raised about Challenger's service "are news to us." He says the company is working with Challenger "to improve this service."

In a written response, Mr. Challenger says his firm tells clients it will automatically send materials to prospective employers. Mr. Challenger says clients are told someone else will sign letters on their behalf, in the roughly 3% of cases where the firm sends materials out by mail.

The firm says it crafts standard cover letters with its clients and asks them to approve the final version. "While the introductory and closing paragraphs are similar across many cover letters, the meat of the cover letter is individualized by the client," Mr. Challenger writes.

Though pieces of advice may seem "silly," he said they are part of an overall message to always think about perceptions of the interviewer. "Ordering ice tea, water or coffee, doesn't stand out. Ordering cranberry juice might."

Write to Phred Dvorak at phred.dvorak@wsj.com and Joann S. Lublin at joann.lublin@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A1

Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, In

Out of Work, and Too Down to Search On

Steve Hebert for The New York Times

“You send out so much, and you don’t get responses. Then when you get called in, you’re treated like you’re too old.” RAY RUCKER, a 62-year-old former facilities manager from Overland Park, Kan. More Photos >

By MICHAEL LUO

Published: September 7, 2009

The New York Times

They were left out of the latest unemployment rate, as they are every month: millions of hidden casualties of the Great Recession who are not counted in the rate because they have stopped looking for work.

Slide Show

Faces of the Uncounted Unemployed

Enlarge This Image

Michael F. McElroy for The New York Times

“There are thousands of people applying for every job I’m looking at.” RICK ALEXANDER, a master carpenter living in Florida More Photos »

But that does not mean these discouraged Americans do not want to be employed. As interviews with several of them demonstrate, many desperately long for a job, but their inability to find one has made them perhaps the ultimate embodiment of pessimism as this recession wears on.

Some have halted their job searches out of sheer frustration. Others have decided it makes more sense to become stay-at-home fathers or mothers, or to go back to school, until the job market improves. Still others have chosen to retire for now and have begun collecting Social Security or disability benefits, for which claims have surged.

Rick Alexander, a master carpenter in Florida who has given up searching after months of effort, said the disappointment eventually became unbearable.

“When you were in high school and kept asking the head cheerleader out for a date and she kept saying no, at some point you stopped asking her,” he said. “It becomes a ‘why bother?’ scenario.”

The official jobless rate, which garners the bulk of attention from politicians and the public, was reported on Friday to have risen to 9.7 percent in August. But to be included in that measure, which is calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics from a monthly nationwide survey, a worker must have actively looked for a job at some point in the preceding four weeks.

For an increasing number of people in this country who would prefer to be working, that is not the case.

It is difficult to assign an exact figure, because of limitations in the data collected by the bureau, but various measures that capture discouragement have swelled in this recession.

In the most direct measure of job market hopelessness, the bureau has a narrow definition of a group it classifies as “discouraged workers.” These are people who have looked for work at some point in the past year but have not looked in the last four weeks because they believe that no jobs are available or that they would not qualify, among other reasons. In August, there were roughly 758,000 discouraged workers nationally, compared with 349,000 in November 2007, the month before the recession officially began.

The bureau also has a broader category of jobless it calls “marginally attached to the labor force,” which includes discouraged workers as well as those who have stopped looking because of other reasons, like school, family responsibilities or health issues. But economists agree that many of these workers probably would have found a way to work in a good economy.

There were roughly 2.3 million people in this group in August, up from 1.4 million in November 2007. If the unemployment rate were expanded to include all marginally attached workers, it would have been 11 percent in August.

But even this figure is probably an undercount of the extent of the jobless problem in this country. There are about 1.4 million more people who are not in the labor force than when the recession began. Some of these are retirees, stay-at-home parents, people on disability and students. But it is also rather likely that many of these people have given up looking for work at least partly because of economic reasons as well.

Here are four people’s stories:

Rick Alexander: A Builder by Trade, With Too Much Time

In the worst case, Rick Alexander figured, he could scrounge up a job at Home Depot.

He was a master carpenter, after all. He had skills. He had run his own successful home-restoration business for 28 years.

In early 2008, however, he moved to Florida to take care of his ailing parents, leaving his business in Connecticut to his daughter.

After helping his parents into an assisted-living facility, he began applying for jobs. He devoted eight hours a day to the task, sometimes sending out three or four applications a day.

“It was a full-time job,” he said.

At first, he focused on jobs in construction, applying to be a site supervisor. He looked for anything within an hour’s commute of where he was living in Jensen Beach.

But the real estate industry had fallen off precipitously, bringing building to a near standstill. Mr. Alexander, 58, began branching out to suppliers, applying at lumberyards and other wholesalers. Eventually, he expanded his search to Home Depot, Lowe’s and mom-and-pop hardware stores. Finally, he began applying for “everything under the sun,” even the overnight shift at convenience stores.

By that summer, he had still received no callbacks for interviews. He went back to Connecticut for several weeks to do a renovation for an old client to earn some cash. When he returned to Florida in August 2008, he tried to start his own business, selling advertising on video displays mounted in coffee shops and other places.

He networked furiously with local businesses, but by then the economy had nose-dived. Mr.

(Page 2 of 3)

“There are thousands of people applying for every job I’m looking at, and potential employers won’t even give me the courtesy of acknowledging I applied,” he said. “The entirety of that causes me not to bother. It’s a waste of my time and theirs.”

Skip to next paragraph

Enlarge This Image

Michael Stravato for The New York Times

“I was just discouraged, fed up and angry, feeling like my career had betrayed me.” JENNY SALINAS, a manager turned stay-at-home mother in Houston More Photos >

The Recession’s Impact

Faces, numbers and stories from behind the downturn.

Multimedia

Slide Show

Faces of the Uncounted Unemployed

He has applied to just two jobs this year, both several months ago. The unemployment rate in his area, Martin County, now exceeds 11 percent. After prodding from his companion, Dona Olinger, he went down to Home Depot a little over a month ago to re-activate his application there.

His savings are gone. He lives with Ms. Olinger, who makes $10 an hour as a volunteer coordinator at a food pantry, Harvest Food and Outreach Center, where they also get groceries every week. It is her salary that pays their rent.

Mr. Alexander’s parents have since moved out of the assisted-living facility and back into their home, so he tends to them most days. He reads Robert Ludlum novels. He sleeps. To fill his time, he is looking into volunteer work. The other day, he cut the grass on his small lawn using just a pair of clippers.

Ray Rucker: Feeling Counted Out With Years Still Left

Ray Rucker came home from a job interview several months ago, sat down in his living room with his suit still on and wept.

The meeting with the interviewer had lasted 10 minutes. The man did not even open a folder in front of him to study Mr. Rucker’s résumé. It was just “jibber jabber,” Mr. Rucker said later.

Mr. Rucker, who lives in Overland Park, Kan., had little doubt about what had happened. He is 62 years old and, as he puts it, “I look 62.”

He lost his job as a facilities manager for Starbucks in Kansas City and Wichita, Kan., last November, when the company closed hundreds of stores across the country. He had done similar work for years for other national restaurant chains and retail outlets.

He landed his first interview within a month, with a retail chain. He was invited back to talk to the vice president of operations and to the director of operations. He was also invited to meet with the company’s chief executive.

But as Mr. Rucker was finishing with the director of operations, she asked him straight out whether he was retiring soon. Shocked, Mr. Rucker answered, truthfully, that he planned to work at least 10 more years.

The meeting with the chief executive never came. Mr. Rucker said he thinks his interviewer simply did not believe he planned to continue working.

A month ago, he found a job posting that seemed tailored for him, a facilities manager for a national restaurant chain. He sent in his résumé and three days later got called for an interview. The company official said he was in a hurry to fill the position. But Mr. Rucker soon learned that this one, too, had slipped from his grasp.

“That’s the one when I kind of threw in the towel,” he said.

Mr. Rucker said he was done looking. His wife, who works at a small nonprofit organization, protested, saying there was more he could do to look.

“You don’t know what I’m going through,” Mr. Rucker said he told her.

“You send out so much, and you don’t get responses,” he said. “Then when you get called in, you’re treated like you’re too old. Why am I doing this?”

So he made an appointment with the local Social Security office to begin claiming benefits. He might try to get some kind of hourly job to help make ends meet. He has mapped out some home renovation projects he wants to do.

The Social Security checks will not equal even a third of what he used to make. But he is now preparing for semiretirement.

Jenny Salinas: From a Nonstop Career to a Focus on the Home

Jenny Salinas never envisioned being a stay-at-home mother, taking care of the children and keeping house. She was the one with the high-powered career, the six-figure salary, always jetting off to Russia or China.

She put her 5-year-old daughter, Mia, in day care when she was three months old. Mia got so used to her mother going away she would simply say, “Mommy’s on a trip,” and blow her kisses when she left.

But after searching unsuccessfully since January for a job, Mrs. Salinas, 37, said her priorities had shifted. She is now content to stay home and focus on her family. She and her husband are even talking about having more children.

“It’s just amazing how it changes your perspective on what’s important,” she said.

 Skip to article

Bottom of Form

Published: September 7, 2009

(Page 3 of 3)

Mrs. Salinas had been a manager of corporate marketing and media relations at an oil and gas company in Houston, where she lives. She was so focused on her career, she said, that she never noticed her daughter had a lazy eye. Mrs. Salinas’s mother mentioned something to her, but only after Mrs. Salinas was laid off did she realize that her daughter needed to see an ophthalmologist.

Skip to next paragraph

Faces, numbers and stories from behind the downturn.

Multimedia

Slide Show

Faces of the Uncounted Unemployed

“That’s how much I was on my BlackBerry,” Mrs. Salinas said.

Mrs. Salinas was initially confident that she would land somewhere quickly. She seemed to be doing well, too, scoring interview after interview for senior-level corporate marketing positions. But each of those prospects dried up, usually because of a hiring freeze or some other obstacle.

So, for the last two months, she has not looked at all. Partly, she has been busy, selling their old house, moving into a new one they are renting at half the monthly expense, seeing her daughter off to kindergarten.

She is helped by the fact that her husband, a vice president at an advertising agency, still has his job. After the couple realized that her job search might take time, they decided to cut back on their spending.

She has in mind a specific set of companies, but they are all still not hiring. Unwilling to settle for just any job, she said, she would rather bide her time.

But the process of searching for work and coming up empty has also left her feeling spent.

“I was just discouraged, fed up and angry, feeling like my career had betrayed me,” she said.

Her daughter used to be in day care or preschool from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., but Mrs. Salinas began dropping her off later and picking her up earlier. Some days, they skip day care completely and while away the day together.

Tatjana Jovanovic-Grove: Moving From Serbia, Scraping By Online

Tatjana Jovanovic-Grove now occupies her days with arts and crafts projects. She makes a little money selling them online undefined $10 here, $50 there undefined but mostly it beats the sense of futility that used to envelop her each day during her quest to find a job.

“I stopped looking because that feeling of being rejected again and again is hard,” she said. “It’s just like somebody punching you in the face.”

Ms. Jovanovic-Grove, 41, has struggled to find work since she immigrated in late 2005 to the United States from her native Serbia, where she was a biology researcher at a prestigious research institute in Belgrade.

She had married an American, Doug Grove, 42, a Wal-Mart mechanic she met over the Internet. The couple initially lived in Glendale, Ariz., with their three children from previous marriages, but they moved to Winston-Salem, N.C., in late 2007.

They were attracted by the weather and the low crime rate. They also thought Ms. Jovanovic-Grove, who earned a master’s degree in Serbia in environmental protection and zoology, would have an easier time finding a job in an area rich with universities.

“I was really thinking I would have no problem,” she said.

The need for her to find work became more urgent after the couple took on thousands of dollars in additional debt after they turned their Arizona home over to a bank in lieu of a foreclosure settlement. They had been unable to sell it amid the state’s collapsing real estate market.

But aside from a few temporary jobs, Ms. Jovanovic-Grove has come up empty on everything from research assistant positions to retail jobs. Meanwhile, her husband’s hours at Wal-Mart, where he is paid a little more than $14 an hour, have been cut back.

In May, she stopped looking completely, concluding that the job market was saturated. Winston-Salem’s unemployment rate exceeded 10 percent.

“You figure out it’s just like when you toss a piece of meat at a pack of hungry cats,” she said. “I just gave up because I could not compete.”

Instead, she has turned to making wood handicrafts and selling them on Etsy.com, an online marketplace. The small payments she gets often mean she earns less than fifty cents an hour for her effort. But she reasoned it is better than wasting gas driving around applying for jobs she believes she cannot get.

Links to media stories about PIT
Click below for:

Wall Street Journal

Links section 1 heading

Links section 2 heading

 
 

Designed by Millennium Concepts, LLC with the help of Tom Desch and Damian Birkel